Public offices and public residences should be dispersed
throughout the country.
It has been difficult from the beginning for the government to select districts for renovation as it plans to relocate capital-centered public offices. Before relocating public offices, government employees cannot compromise to narrow their differences over choosing relocation areas between Busan Metropolitan City and public offices. It would be convenient for employees who are moving to find close access and transportation from their homes to work. However, it is not easy to find residences for three thousand families or 50 to 100 thousand pyung (1 pyung＝3.954 sq. yds.), including good transportation, near work.
It is difficult for the government to decide the location of the residences before they decide the relocation areas of the public offices. The public office side prefers the Haeundae area, but Busan Metropolitan City has difficulty in deciding the place because they only have limited outward places, such as Sugdae or a new urban area of Gangseu, Myunggi district, or Samsungli, Ilgang sub-county. It is difficult for the public office side to accept such places. However, it cannot be ignored that most of the relocation areas they want are already developed. They cannot find any other area.
The national government and the ruling party defined their positions that three public offices moving to Busan should each located each according to related branch offices. Two public offices of the Film and Screen section are moving to Haeundae county, four offices of the Financial section to the Namgu Moonhyeun Dong financial complex, and four offices of the Ocean and Marine section to Youngdogu. Unrelated offices may not be allocated to the same place.
They need to solve the problem of co-residency for the employees of the government offices in the same manner as relocating the public offices. The employees should stop insisting on Haeundae, but consider the relocation of the public offices first. It is not desirable for them to debate over the limited area. The public office should abandon its unrealistic decision to occupy co-residency and consider allocated areas positively.
|
 / 입력시간: 2005. 11.23. 08:51
|
|
|
